|
|
Rockport Suspension
Bridge |
|
The documents
reproduced here give three different perspectives on
the Rockport suspension bridge. The first is an article
from The Mining and Scientific Press. Published
in San Francisco beginning in 1860, this was the first
mining journal on the Pacific coast. The article gives
a "nuts and bolts" description of the bridge construction
in progress. Following the article are excerpts from
two letters of D. L. Albert. Albert was the secretary
of the Cottaneva Lumber Company. The first letter was
addressed to W. E. Guild of Finkbine-Guilld Lumber Company,
one of the investors who purchased the assets of the
Cottaneva Lumber Company in the mid-1920s; the second
letter was addressed to the California Redwood Association.
Albert gives a more colorful history of the Rockport
suspension bridge. As is often the case with "oral histories",
Albert's memory of when the bridge was constructed conflicts
a bit with the article in The Mining and Scientific
Press. He adds, however, more human details about
the man, W. R. Miller, and his "do it yourself" attitude.
Bernie Agrons, the last general manager
of Rockport Redwood Company before it ceased mill operations
in 1957, re-visited Rockport Beach in 2007 and recounted
the building of the suspension bridge ( wmv 2.5 MB).
Mining and
Scientific Press |
30 June
1877 |
Mr. R. W. Gorrill,
Treasurer and Engineer of the Pacific Bridge Co., gives
us the following particulars of a new steel wire
suspension bridge which he is erecting in Mendocino
county for Mr. W. R. MIller. It is located at Cottoneva,
on the coast, and extends from the main land to a rocky
island where a chute is to be built for shipping
lumber.
The distance from center
to center of the saddles on the towers is 270 feet. The
deflection or fall of the cable is 23 feet, six inches.
The cables are built in the same manner as those of the
Clifton bridge at Niagara. The steel wire is No. 11
Birmingham gauge, and is protected against rust by
immersing in a bath which gives it a fine coat of zinc.
There are 11 wires in each strand, seven strands in each
one and one-half inch rope, and seven ropes in each
cable. The ropes are not twisted together to form the
cables, but gathered up every six feet by the suspender
bands. Each rope is warranted to bear a strain of 60
tons. Each rope is made fast to an independent
anchor-bar, one by three inches in diameter, and forming
links 18 feet long, until connection is made with the
anchors. The anchors are of cast iron, three and
one-half by three feet in surface, weigh 1,000 pounds
each, and are placed 14 feet below the surface of the
rock.
Great care was taken in
securing these anchors in place by means of cross I
beams which run under the rock on either side. The lower
par of each pit was enlarged so as to form a
hemispherical chamber, and the rock-work, set in
Portland cement, which is built upon the anchor, is so
constructed that the upward strain is transmitted to its
sides. The towers are of redwood. There
are four posts 10x10 inches, and two 10x12 inches,
giving an effective area of 640 square inches to
withstand the strain of the cable on the tower. The
wooden truss to prevent vertical vibration is eight feet
high of of the Howe truss pattern. The 270 feet of the
bridge is divided into 45 pannels. The longest
suspenders, 44 in number, are of seven-eight-inch steel
wire, the 42 shorter ones are of one and one-eight-inch
solid iron.
The estimated dead load of
the bridge is 1,000 pounds per linear foot; live load,
one tone per linear foot; in all, one and one-half tons,
or one-fifth of actual breaking load. The bridge will be
completed in about 30 days, and promises to be a
structure which the builder may well be proud
of.
We were shown a portion of
an iron bar from the Ashtabula bridge, which was so
crystalline in its structure that probably not
one-twentieth of its substance had any greater strength
than pig iron. This unfavorable condition was
undoubtedly produced by the rearrangement of the
molecules, produced by the vibration of the bridge under
passing trains and changes of temperature. Mr. Gorilla
prefers a combination of wood and iron the he truss
bridges, as the elasticity of the former saves the iron
from the sever strain which is put upon it when all
parts are rigid He also insist upon a facto of safety of
five in ordinary bridges and six for railways. We hope
to illustrate this subject with a good cut of the bride
and some of its more important details before long.
(Mining and Scientific Press, San Francisco, 30 June
1877, Vol. 34, Number 26, p.
420) |
D. L.
Albert C. A. Hooper and Co., 215 Market
St. San Francisco, CA
7 April
1927
W. E.
Guild Finkbine-Guild Lumber Co., Jackson,
Mississippi
Dear Mr. Guild:
|
...Now I am going to give
you Mr. W. R. Miller's experience when he built Rockport
up in 1875 and 6. He went to the Pacific Bridge Company
here in San Francisco for an estimate on that 510 ft.
wire suspension bridge at Rockport. After considerable
surveying, etc., they gave him an estimate of $100,000
for the bridge only, not including the two approaches
you will notice in the photos you have. Another thing,
he had less than $50,000 and very little credit, so he
told them he would have to give it up if it was going to
cost him so much, but that if they would lend him one of
their best men for a foreman, he would do it
himself.
They told him he could
have his pick, so he selected a man by the name of Carl.
They went to Rockport, took their measurements, and were
back in three weeks. (Remember, they had to go from
Petaluma by horseback as there were no wagon roads much
farther). They got their materials on a sailing schooner
for bridge, sawmill, and a winter's supply of supplies,
left here in August 1875, reached Rockport in October.
Next month watched for a big high tide and headed the
vessel full speed for the beach. Being a flat bottomed
vessel with the center load lifted, she went high and
dry on the beach where he could unload her. He built the
bridge and mill that winter and in July 1876, he
launched the vessel, pulled her under his chute, loaded
her with lumber and was in San Francisco in August. His
bridge, including the two approaches had cost him
$25,500. Mr. Miller and Mr. Carl have told me their
experiences many times, which were very interesting to
listen to. This is what I am leading up to, why bother
with contractors and pay them a profit when you can do
the work yourself better and save the profit. You will
be surprised how fast that wharf work will go if you get
a good live crew on your pile driver. It took me 28 days
to put the 600 feet in at Hardy Creek. I hope I am not
boring you but I cannot help it. The weather is still
unsettled; looks like a storm this morning.
Yours truly,
D. L.
Albert |
D.L.
Albert C. A. Hooper and Co., 215 Market
St. San Francisco, CA
8 April
1928
California Redwood
Association
|
[At the beginning of the
letter, Albert mentions the pictures of the Rockport
suspension bridge that he had sent.]
You will note the bridge
is a wonderful specimen of engineering, due to the
unusual and hazardous difficulties encountered on such a
rugged coast.
It was erected in 1875 by
Mr. Carl, Engineer of the Pacific Bridge Co., and owned
by Mr. W. R. Miller, a pioneer lumber merchant. The
bridge was imperative for disposal of lumber from the
mill to coastal ships, which, incidentally, cold not get
closer than some 150 feet from the rock. Pier
construction at that time and particular location would
nave amounted to a tremendous figure. The most feasible
proposition was a span from the shore line to a large
table-top rock, as you may see in the pictures. The
selection of materials was carefully considered, as the
Engineers knew that the structure would be subjected to
extremely severe conditions and hard usage.
Because of it's [sic]
phenomenal durability, California Redwood was installed
in all the frame construction. Fourteen 1-3/4"
galvanized steel cables were stressed over four towers,
each built of six 14'X14' Redwood timbers. In 1886, W.
R. Miller sold out to the Cottoneva Lumber Company and
up to 1900 the bridge was in constant use until the mill
was destroyed by fire that year. From 1900 to 1925, it
was entirely unattended and no care was taken of it
whatsoever. During the summer of 1925 some careless
people left fire near the bridge which destroyed the
shore end. However, the Redwood towers on the ocean end
are still standing. I have sent you a piece of one of
these timbers, and you may see for yourself that after
50 years service, the wood is in as good a condition as
the day it was incorporated in the structure.
This, I believe, is a
remarkable example in durability of this wonder-wood,
and I feel justified in stating, that I cannot think of
a more durable and serviceable species to use for wood
construction that will be exposed to the most trying
conditions possible, as California Redwood.
Yours truly,
D.L.
Albert |
|
|
|
Author: DMS
|
Photo
Credit
Rockport suspension
bridge and rails. Robert J. Lee Collection, Ukiah,
Ca.
Primary
Source
Rockport Redwood Company
Records, BANC MSS 70/184 c, The Bancroft Library (Berkeley,
California).
Secondary
Source
Mining and
Scientific Press (San Francisco), 30 June 1877, Vol. 34,
Number 26, p. 420.
Video
Video interview
of Bernie Agrons, Rockport Beach, 6 May 2007, conducted
by Doris M. Schoenhoff
| |
|
| |
|